Skip to main content

Staking Rewards

A Proof of Stake (PoS), (i.e. using in-protocol asset, BTG, to provide secure consensus) design is outlined here. Openos implements a proof of stake reward/security scheme for validator nodes in the cluster. The purpose is threefold:

  • Align validator incentives with that of the greater cluster through skin-in-the-game deposits at risk

  • Avoid 'nothing at stake' fork voting issues by implementing slashing rules aimed at promoting fork convergence

  • Provide an avenue for validator rewards provided as a function of validator participation in the cluster.

While many of the details of the specific implementation are currently under consideration and are expected to come into focus through specific modeling studies and parameter exploration on the Openos testnet, we outline here our current thinking on the main components of the PoS system. Much of this thinking is based on the current status of Casper FFG, with optimizations and specific attributes to be modified as is allowed by Openos's Proof of History (PoH) blockchain data structure.

General Overview​

Openos's ledger validation design is based on a rotating, stake-weighted selected leader broadcasting transactions in a PoH data structure to validating nodes. These nodes, upon receiving the leader's broadcast, have the opportunity to vote on the current state and PoH height by signing a transaction into the PoH stream.

To become a Openos validator, one must deposit/lock-up some amount of BTG in a contract. This BTG will not be accessible for a specific time period. The precise duration of the staking lockup period has not been determined. However we can consider three phases of this time for which specific parameters will be necessary:

  • Warm-up period: which BTG is deposited and inaccessible to the node, however PoH transaction validation has not begun. Most likely on the order of days to weeks

  • Validation period: a minimum duration for which the deposited BTG will be inaccessible, at risk of slashing (see slashing rules below) and earning rewards for the validator participation. Likely duration of months to a year.

  • Cool-down period: a duration of time following the submission of a 'withdrawal' transaction. During this period validation responsibilities have been removed and the funds continue to be inaccessible. Accumulated rewards should be delivered at the end of this period, along with the return of the initial deposit.

Openos's trustless sense of time and ordering provided by its PoH data structure, along with its turbine data broadcast and transmission design, should provide sub-second transaction confirmation times that scale with the log of the number of nodes in the cluster. This means we shouldn't have to restrict the number of validating nodes with a prohibitive 'minimum deposits' and expect nodes to be able to become validators with nominal amounts of BTG staked. At the same time, Openos's focus on high-throughput should create incentive for validation clients to provide high-performant and reliable hardware. Combined with potentially a minimum network speed threshold to join as a validation-client, we expect a healthy validation delegation market to emerge.

Penalties​

As discussed in the Economic Design section, annual validator interest rates are to be specified as a function of total percentage of circulating supply that has been staked. The cluster rewards validators who are online and actively participating in the validation process throughout the entirety of their validation period. For validators that go offline/fail to validate transactions during this period, their annual reward is effectively reduced.

Similarly, we may consider an algorithmic reduction in a validator's active staked amount in the case that they are offline. I.e. if a validator is inactive for some amount of time, either due to a partition or otherwise, the amount of their stake that is considered ‘active’ (eligible to earn rewards) may be reduced. This design would be structured to help long-lived partitions to eventually reach finality on their respective chains as the % of non-voting total stake is reduced over time until a supermajority can be achieved by the active validators in each partition. Similarly, upon re-engaging, the ‘active’ amount staked will come back online at some defined rate. Different rates of stake reduction may be considered depending on the size of the partition/active set.